How do I fix this? Freshly upgraded F21 clears logo and leaves screen blank.

asked 2016-01-09 21:24:06 -0500

updated 2016-01-11 22:17:22 -0500

Yes, I know F21 is 'end of life', but the author of Fedup always recommended upgrading one level at a time, so I used Fedup to go from F19 to F20, which worked well, then from F20 to F21, which does not. If I let it boot by itself, I see the boot screen with the Fedora logo, the curly 'F', printed then cleared (so far, in the normal manner). But then instead of seeing the graphical login manager, I see the screen go blank and stay there.

Interestingly enough, if I hit Esc during the boot, I can get a console and login there with no obvious problems. Likewise if I edit the Grub line starting with 'linux' to include the runlevel '3' at the end. But then I have no network, which may be an unrelated problem (I suspect SELinux here, since the journal shows permission denied on reaching the socket; but I have tried both disabling SELinux and setting to permissive mode only; neither solved it though the former at least made SELinux errors go away).

Speaking of the journal, I did use "journalctl --no-full --reverse" to try to figure out what was going on, but I am not that sure how to interpret what I am seeing there: I see, for example, errors from X including "(EE) Fatal server error" (EE)" and "(EE) no driver available" but I realize X has long had a lot of unfixed error messages, so I am not sure how seriously to take this one. Nor do I know what to look for to see why the driver is not available; it looked to me like it was available.

I have seen Ask Fedora questions about similar sounding failures, but those were because of Nvidia cards. Mine is Radeon. (In a Lenovo E525).

So what should I be looking for in the journal or in which logs?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Honestly, if you are coming from Fedora 19 and you want to upgrade until you reach a supported version (currently 22 /23), I would recommend you to

  1. backup you system (entire home folder with all .hidden files and folders and maybe /etc if you think you need it)
  2. Do a clean install of Fedora 22
  3. Restore your backup

The likelyhood you end up with a proper and fast system is higher than upgrading 3 or 4 times.

florian gravatar imageflorian ( 2016-01-11 12:30:04 -0500 )edit

If even the non graphical console failed, I would do as you say, going ahead with a fresh install. I did a pretty comprehensive backup before the F19 -> F20 upgrade, though I will have to double check about the hidden files. But those are probably still there, since I can access the file system through the console created by Esc during bootup.

But since I can still run Fedora in a console, I am reluctant to give up when I seem so close.

mejohnsn gravatar imagemejohnsn ( 2016-01-11 12:37:11 -0500 )edit

@mejohnsn: I understand.

An easy way to access your files in a graphical environment is through a live cd/dvd/usb. Just boot Fedora from there, mount your existing /home and copy all you need to an external drive. Or if your /home parition is already a separate partition and you are happy with the rest of the partition setup, you should be able to freshly install Fedora 22 and using the existing /home with its content. Just make sure you don't format it during partition setup.

florian gravatar imageflorian ( 2016-01-11 14:55:28 -0500 )edit

Have you tried running package-cleanup problems and package-cleanup --cleandupes yet? If nothing else, this will make sure that you don't have any package conflicts causing problems.

sideburns gravatar imagesideburns ( 2016-01-11 23:37:50 -0500 )edit

@sideburns: "package-cleanup problems" is an error, ""package-cleanup --problems" gives a list without modifying anything. Sure, it is suspicious how many packages came up in said list as 'missing requirements'; most of them are packages I never use, but a few such as "libLLVM-3.4()so(64bit)" look suspicious.

Interestingly enough, after executing "package-cleanup", though this failed when it tried to access the network (please recall I did say that was not working), the next time I booted the system with runlevel=3 (i.e., ' 3', at end of "linux...), it did get to network. So some progress.

mejohnsn gravatar imagemejohnsn ( 2016-01-13 01:26:03 -0500 )edit