Xen on fedora 19 and ati video card acceleration,

asked 2013-07-24 12:31:48 -0600

lo92fr gravatar image

updated 2013-07-24 22:14:03 -0600

FranciscoD_ gravatar image

Hello,

Sorry if it's not the good place to ask. I install the xen supervisor on my fedora 19 computer. The matter is that i'm unable to get video card acceleration for my ati radeon X1200 card. When I boot the kernel (3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64) under xen, dmesg show me the following message when loading the radeon module:

[    1.955382] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
[    1.956425] radeon 0000:01:05.0: VRAM: 128M 0x0000000078000000 - 0x000000007FFFFFFF (128M used)
[    1.956428] radeon 0000:01:05.0: GTT: 512M 0x0000000080000000 - 0x000000009FFFFFFF
[    1.960284] [drm] radeon: 128M of VRAM memory ready
[    1.960286] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
[    1.975409] [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 z pipes initialized.
[    1.976906] radeon 0000:01:05.0: WB enabled
[    1.976912] radeon 0000:01:05.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000000 and cpu addr 0xffff8800031e8000
[    1.977026] radeon 0000:01:05.0: radeon: using MSI.
[    1.977119] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
[    1.978330] [drm] radeon: ring at 0x0000000080001000
[    2.121228] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed (scratch(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD)
[    2.121268] [drm:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22).
[    2.121304] radeon 0000:01:05.0: failed initializing CP (-22).
[    2.121338] radeon 0000:01:05.0: Disabling GPU acceleration
[    2.121811] [drm] radeon: cp finalized
[    2.244901] fbcon: radeondrmfb (fb0) is primary device
[    2.350439] radeon 0000:01:05.0: fb0: radeondrmfb frame buffer device
[    2.350441] radeon 0000:01:05.0: registered panic notifier   
[    2.350468] [drm] Initialized radeon 2.30.0 20080528 for 0000:01:05.0 on minor 0

The revealant message seems to be :

[    2.121228] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed (scratch(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD)

When booting under regular kernel, the message is not there, and everything initialize ok!

I'm looking on internet, and find some reference on this message, but about older kernel 2.6.xxx. Does any one know if it should working, and if I miss something ? Help would be apreciate...

regards, Laurent ARNAL

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Do you still get this with the newer kernel updates?

m.p.kingsley gravatar imagem.p.kingsley ( 2013-08-19 13:04:24 -0600 )edit