Ask Your Question
1

Edit Gnome 3.8 Classic-mode Applications Menu

asked 2013-07-01 14:16:26 -0600

faustus gravatar image

updated 2013-07-06 02:48:42 -0600

FranciscoD_ gravatar image

Does anyone who's used the new "classic-mode" in Gnome 3.8 (Fedora 19) know how to edit the contents of the Applications menu? Right-clicking on the menu has no effect. Of course it doesn't! What was I thinking? Anything that makes so much sense has been stripped from Gnome 3.x.

Classic mode looks to be almost a return to sanity, but I'd really like a way to fully customize the Applications menu.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

1

This is too much cynicism to be a productive question. What kind of customizing are you trying to do? The menu entries come from .desktop files provided with the application they launch.

randomuser gravatar imagerandomuser ( 2013-07-02 23:04:30 -0600 )edit

The added cynicism in no way diminishes the question; with or without, the question remains the same, though I will expand upon it: In Gnome 2, one used to have the option to edit the Applications Menu by right-clicking on the menu or running alacarte. Neither option is available now. I want to be able to edit the menu in the most simple and obvious ways: adding and removing application launchers, or recategorizing them.

faustus gravatar imagefaustus ( 2013-07-04 17:47:05 -0600 )edit

Faustus has a point. Why in the world is there no working menu editor when we are on the fourth stable build of Gnome Shell? How many years should we wait to get back a standard feature such as a menu editor?

petrochemicals gravatar imagepetrochemicals ( 2013-07-05 14:21:29 -0600 )edit

@petrochemicals: because no one has written a menu editor for gnome-classic yet? Why don't you go ahead and write one to help them? If you are this frustrated, why not just use MATE instead? A menu editor is probably just not very high on upstream's list of TODOs when compared to major tasks such as porting to Wayland.

FranciscoD_ gravatar imageFranciscoD_ ( 2013-07-06 01:59:17 -0600 )edit

And: you're going to have to wait as long as it takes upstream to finish their work, especially if you're not helping them speed up by contributing.

FranciscoD_ gravatar imageFranciscoD_ ( 2013-07-06 02:09:33 -0600 )edit

3 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2013-07-06 19:59:34 -0600

FranciscoD_ gravatar image

updated 2013-07-06 20:05:36 -0600

There is probably no applications menu editor till now. All I know is alacarte, but I'm not sure if it's been kept up to speed with gnome3.

EDIT: This post says alacarte will work: http://blog.10minutesoftech.com/how-to/gnome3-alacarte/

Not used it myself, and I'm not certain how this plays with the classic menu. Another post that discusses this: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=933541

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Alacarte is partially functional. I tried it before even posting this question, and it showed so many bugs and crashes I just assumed it was never updated to work with Gnome 3. Trying again, however, I find I can at least disable certain menu items, which is something. I still can't delete the entries entirely, or move them around, without an immediate crash. Perhaps it is the way forward though, with some bug fixes/upgrades to improve compatibility with the Gnome 3 Classic Applications menu.

faustus gravatar imagefaustus ( 2013-07-06 23:11:19 -0600 )edit
0

answered 2013-07-16 14:48:49 -0600

hintak gravatar image

You need some javascript skills, but I found one way of doing it - editing

/usr/share/gnome-shell/modes/classic.json

directly. You can then do "gnome-shell --mode=classic --replace &" to reload. Caveat any editing you do will be wiped when you next do package update of that. (part f gnome-classic-session package).

edit flag offensive delete link more
-1

answered 2013-07-06 04:43:21 -0600

jcezanna56 gravatar image

Why don't you give xfce a chance ? It is faster and lighter then gnome. I used gnome for years, from the beginning, but stop with their gnome-shell. I supposed developpers got happiness with it, but he isn't done for me.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thanks for the XFCE suggestion. I was actually using Cinnamon up until very recently, for usability reasons. While I appreciate the speed and lightweight factors you point out, in theory, they really aren't a practical issue for me personally; I'm not going to notice a performance difference of nanoseconds on my overkill hardware. When I heard about Classic Mode being promoted from a fallback shell to a fully supported Gnome desktop option, I decided to give Gnome 3 another shot. In spite of a few annoyances, I am finding it mostly usable. I'd like to give Gnome a chance to improve.

faustus gravatar imagefaustus ( 2013-07-06 13:43:26 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 2013-07-01 14:16:26 -0600

Seen: 7,378 times

Last updated: Jul 16 '13