Without wanting to sound negative, 'unknwon' is the answer. The Fedora project is sponsored by RedHat, which btw holds the trademark for it. The question here is obviously to what extent the new owner IBM will continue sponsoring the project. I do not speak for RedHat nor for IBM, I have worked for both of these companies and I can say that they have a different way of work.
As Fedora has proved to be a successful upstream test platform for things to end up in a production RHEL environment, I would imagine that it would be in the best interest of IBM to continue the sponsorship of the project, as the Fedora community feeds directly into one of their own core products (RHEL is the foundation for many of the cloud computing projects). Having said that, the swallowing of the entire RedHat portofolio by a company (even) of the size of IBM will be a difficult task to perform. IBM contributed to Linux from the very early days is one thing, maintaining the flavor of a distro ecosystem that took years to form is another.
If I was a community leader in Fedora, I would be quick to clarify the situation with RedHat management. Even if IBM pulls the plug (again, I hope and imagine that they won't), there is a body of users large enough to create an impetus to fork the project.
It is a good question but should probably be closed as off topic / speculative
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/28/661598...
@Panther , problably admin's don't close this question as speculative because is good to know the opinion of the comunity about the future of fedora and red hat itself, regards.,
I'm going to close this question. There's no info, and it'll just turn into idle speculation. When a change is made, it'll be announced and we'll all deal with it as we seem fit.
@Adamclisi -> IBM_acquisition_of_Red_Hat