Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

I commented you for considering alternates ro your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systems, etc.

  5. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.

I commented commend you for considering alternates ro your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systems, etc.

  5. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.

ubuntu.

I commend you for considering alternates ro your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is on the cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systems, etc.systesystems, ubuntu is years behind the curve.

  5. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.

I commend you for considering alternates ro your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is on the cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systesystems, ubuntu is years behind the curve.

Be warned, new features have growing pains too.

  1. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.

I commend you for considering alternates ro your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is on the cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systesystems, ubuntu systemd, etc. Ubuntu is years behind the curve.

Be warned, new features have growing pains too.

  1. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.

I commend you for considering alternates ro to your usual OS.

Historically, ubuntu was founded at a time when linux, even debian, was difficult to install and use and catered to new users and thus rapidly became a popular OS.

BUT fast forward to modern times and ubuntu has faltered for a variety of reasons I will not go into here and other os, including fedora, have matured.

Fedora is not so difficult to install, 3rd party repos are easily available, documentation is much better than ubuntu, and support is available.

Same can be said of many distros. The advantages of rhel / centos / fedora are, IMHO

  1. Fedora is much more closely aligned with the major open source projects than ubuntu including, but not limited to gnome and the kernel.

  2. Security. Fedora fully supports selinux while in ubuntu apparmor is a bolt on, less developed than selinux, and the end user is left to write policy. As with all of fedora selinux and the tools to manage policy has matured.

  3. Features of dnf / yum. The package manager has superior features including history and roll back and confirmation of installed packages.

  4. Fedora is on the cutting edge of linux and is the first, or one of the first, to roll out new features such as wayland, systemd, etc. Ubuntu is years behind the curve.

Be warned, new features have growing pains too.

  1. Business. IMHO RHEL is far superior to ubuntu in the business sector and I predict ubuntu is in decline in this aspect.

If those features appeal to you, try fedora. If not stay with ubuntu.